Did Trudeau take #Catholic communion at Easter (against Canon 915) #ottnews #cdnpoli #ocsb


Justinjustin 2

We know that the “catholic” school boards are big fans of pro-choice Justin:


  • April 20, 2006 – Ontario Catholic School Trustees Association. $7,500
  • May 17 & 18, 2007 – Niagara Catholic District School Board. $15,000
  • February 5, 2008 – Peterborough Victoria Northhumberland Clarington Catholic School Board. $10,000
  • February 9, 2008 – Ontario English Catholic Teachers Association. $10,000
  • May 21, 2008 – Notre Dame Catholic Secondary School. $10,000
  • November 6, 2009 – Waterloo Catholic District School Board. $15,000
  • May 7, 2010 – Algonquin & Lakeshore Catholic District School Board. $15,000 (Source)

so this topic is relevant to this blog.


We see that Justin had a grand old time as Mass on Fogo Island. A priest from Africa gave him a hearty welcome. The article would have probably mentioned is Justin did NOT receive Eucharist, so it is fair to assume that he probably did.




On May 16th, Ottawa’s Archbishop published a statement in response to Trudeau’s edict entitled, “Being in Communion with the Catholic Church on Moral Issues”.  In a stinging rebuke of Justin Trudeau, the letter states unequivocally, “One may not dissent from these core teachings on life issues and be considered a Catholic in good standing.”  Archbishop Prendergast instructed all parish priests in his diocese to make the letter available to parishioners on the upcoming Sunday.


It looks like Justin came to a quiet agreement with his local Bishop in Ottawa to NOT receive communion (and that applies everywhere).


The Skinny On The Street Is That Justin Trudeau Is No Longer Receiving Communion

Catholic parishioner in Montreal:

“…the argument is, I think academic, on the several occasions I have been with him at Mass, he did not receive communion.”


There is also a recent post from this blog:



Denial of Holy Communion?
There is a rumour amongst the Ottawa political hack class (of which I was once a part). It seems the rumour is that Cardinal Collins has written to the Prime Minister advising him not to present himself for Holy Communion in the Archdiocese of Toronto. The liberal lapdogs are outraged, – how dare this Churchman tell the Dear Leader he can’t take the cracker!
Perhaps, Justin got confused after the letter from the Toronto  Cardinal and thought he only had to refrain from receiving communion in Toronto and Ottawa and he was fine to receive elsewhere? Perhaps, he thought that nobody would notice on Fogo Island? Perhaps, now that his children are older he can’t explain to them why he is not allowed to receive?
Justin has been pushing abortion overseas, taking away doctors conscience rights about euthanasia, pushing the gay marriage agenda in Canada and overseas. Why does he think he can receive Eucharist?
The media were all aflutter when Harper incorrectly took Catholic communion, but will they ignore Justin’s communion reception? He is just as banned as Harper from receiving communion.
Will they give Justin a pass in this area?
How does Sophie ““The sacred feminine is on the rise” Yogi Gregroire feel about Jesus having only male 12 apostles and instituting a male-only priesthood? Did she also receive communion?
Sophie Yoga
Sophie: “The Sacred Feminine is on the rise”

St Peter’s GSA and Rainbow Day #OCSB

The radical St Peter’s GSA “Love is Louder” is back at it again this week – visiting homerooms, pushing rainbow and “multi-colours” – they have a radical LGBTQ agenda against the Church (ignore the puffy works like acceptance and “open-mindedness”). Their previous FB pages show theie TRUE agenda

Love is Louder

“Merely having an open mind is nothing. The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid.”
G.K. Chesterton









Love is Louder 1




Students learning the Stanky Leg Dance #OCSB #ottnews #ottschools

Why can’t children read and write? They are too busy learning “watch me whip” and “Stanky Leg”. Apparently these are 21st century skills that the Boards keep talking about


Taxpayers are paying for Luv2Groove to come into many OCSB schools. Just google the two together and you can see how many schools are using L2G.



Hip Hop OCSB

Here is Luv2Groove teaching the students the Stanky Leg Dance
A dance that men with big baggy pants do when they need to “air out” a fart.
“Ah! You doing the stanky legg? Because i feel a stanky legg coming on
Short video:

Radical Genderbread Person sex ed in “#catholic” schools #ocsb #tcdsb

OPHEA is an organization most school boards belong to in order to get curriculum resources for health and phys ed.
Check out this webinar. Teachers are trained how to bully students who reject gender ideology (“where did you learn that?”, “that statement is against our enforces conduct of behaviour”, etc)


31 minutes onward


Watch and share! This is what elementary Catholic students will be subjected to!






“Cultural Catholic” Principals promote Good Friday Easter Egg hunts #ocsb #tcdsb

This is what REAL Catholic families do on Good Friday: they go to the 3pm service and also do the Way of the Cross with the Archbishop:



way of the cross



This is what the “cultural Catholic” CPCO (catholic principals ontario) do:

they promote Easter Egg hunts on Good Friday!!



Easter Egg CPCO

CPCO Easter Fun










CARFLEO and changing Church Teaching #OCSB #TCDSB

CARFLEO is the organization for religion teachers in “catholic” schools.


A 2010 CARFLEO conference:


Comments by Catholic Bioethicist Moira McQueen

“Continuing the theme of the link between bioethics and sexual ethics, questions continue to arise about homosexuality, sexual diversity and, for example, the Ontario Government’s requirements for equity in schools, including sexual equity. As a speaker at CARFLEO’s conference in 2010, and in talking about Catholic teaching on sexual ethics, I was somewhat surprised at the more or less general acceptance of the idea that homosexual activity should be treated as equal to heterosexual behaviour. The other keynote speaker and myself were diametrically opposed on this issue, which did not surprise me. I assumed that was why we were both asked to speak. What did surprise me, and what I later recounted to the main organizer of the event, was the fact that a senior member of the group expressed in the concluding remarks the hope that the Church would change its teaching, with the clear implication that it is wrong in its teaching at present. I expressed my concern that my part of the proceedings had been “blindsided” by this, which is still how I perceive the outcome of this event. Of course my concern was and is that church teaching was being deemed irrelevant and wrong.”


Since then:









#OCSB Grade 11 World Religions is an Islam Marketing Course

We preface this by saying that no hatred should be shown to Muslims. This article simply criticizes Islamic beliefs and how the Grade 11 World Religions class errs in its teaching of Islam

Page after page of their course is filled with misinformation and blatant propaganda for Islam

Islam chapter  < PDF of Islam Chapter

Just one example of many :


Catholics have no formal view on Muhammed??  Of course we do! There were no prophets after the time of Jesus!! Muhammed is a false prophet.



“Whoever does not embrace the Catholic Christian faith is lost, like your false prophet Muhammad.”

-St. Peter Mavimenus (d. 8th century), martyr from Gaza. Response reported in the Martyriologum Romanum when he was asked to convert to Islam by a group of Muslims.


“There is also the superstition of the Ishmaelites which to this day prevails and keeps people in error, being a forerunner of the Antichrist…. From that time to the present a false prophet named Mohammed has appeared in their midst. This man, after having chanced upon the Old and New Testaments and likewise, it seems, having conversed with an Arian monk, devised his own heresy. Then, having insinuated himself into the good graces of the people by a show of seeming piety, he gave out that a certain book had been sent down to him from heaven. He had set down some ridiculous compositions in this book of his and he gave it to them as an object of veneration.”

-St. John Damascene (d. 749), Syrian Arab Catholic monk and scholar. Quoted from his book On Heresies under the section On the Heresy of the Ishmaelites (in The Fathers of the Church. Vol. 37. Translated by the Catholic University of America. CUA Press. 1958. Pages 153-160.)


“We profess Christ to be truly God and your prophet to be a precursor of the Antichrist and other profane doctrine.”

-Sts. Habenitus, Jeremiah, Peter, Sabinian, Walabonsus, and Wistremundus (d. 851), martyrs of Cordoba, Spain. Reported in the Memoriale Sanctorum in response to Spanish Umayyad Caliph ‘Abd Ar-Rahman II’s ministers that they convert to Islam on pain of death.


“On the other hand, those who founded sects committed to erroneous doctrines proceeded in a way that is opposite to this, the point is clear in the case of Muhammad. He seduced the people by promises of carnal pleasure to which the concupiscence of the flesh goads us. His teaching also contained precepts that were in conformity with his promises, and he gave free rein to carnal pleasure. In all this, as is not unexpected, he was obeyed by carnal men. As for proofs of the truth of his doctrine, he brought forward only such as could be grasped by the natural ability of anyone with a very modest wisdom. Indeed, the truths that he taught he mingled with many fables and with doctrines of the greatest falsity. He did not bring forth any signs produced in a supernatural way, which alone fittingly gives witness to divine inspiration; for a visible action that can be only divine reveals an invisibly inspired teacher of truth. On the contrary, Muhammad said that he was sent in the power of his arms—which are signs not lacking even to robbers and tyrants.”

St. Thomas Aquinas (d. 1274), Theologian and Doctor of the Church. Quoted from his De Rationibus Fidei Contra Saracenos, Graecos, et Armenos and translated from Fr. Damian Fehlner’sAquinas on Reasons for the Faith: Against the Muslims, Greeks, and Armenians (Franciscans of the Immaculate. 2002.).


“As we have seen, Muhammed had neither supernatural miracles nor natural motives of reason to persuade those of his sect. As he lacked in everything, he took to bestial and barbaric means, which is the force of arms. Thus he introduced and promulgated his message with robberies, murders, and bloodshedding, destroying those who did not want to receive it, and with the same means his ministers conserve this today, until God placates his anger and destroys this pestilence from the earth.


(Muhammad) can also be figured for the dragon in the same Apocalypse which says that the dragon swept up a third of the stars and hurled down a third to earth. Although this line is more appropriately understood concerning the Antichrist, Mohammed was his precursor – the prophet of Satan, father of the sons of haughtiness.


Even if all the things contained in his law were fables in philosophy and errors in theology, even for those who do not possess the light of reason, the very manners (Islam) teaches are from a school of vicious bestialities. (Muhammad) did not prove his new sect with any motive, having neither supernatural miracles nor natural reasons, but solely the force of arms, violence, fictions, lies, and carnal license. It remains an impious, blasphemous, vicious cult, an innovention of the devil, and the direct way into the fires of hell. It does not even merit the name of being called a religion.”

-St. Juan de Ribera (d.1611), Archbishop of Valencia, missionary to Spanish Muslims, and organizer of the Muslim expulsions of 1609 from Spain. Quoted in several locations from his 1599Catechismo para la Instruccion de los Nuevos Convertidos de los Moros (my translation).


“The Mahometan paradise, however, is only fit for beasts; for filthy sensual pleasure is all the believer has to expect there.”

St. Alfonsus Liguori (d. 1787). Quoted from his book, The History of Heresies and their Refutation.


Hilaire Belloc, the great 20th century Catholic historian and poet, warned in 1929 that Islam would make a return to the world stage:

We shall almost certainly have to reckon with Islam in the near future. Perhaps, if we lose our Faith, it will rise. For after this subjugation of the Islamic culture by the nominally Christian had already been achieved, the political conquerors of that culture began to notice two disquieting features about it. The first was that its spiritual foundation proved immovable; the second that its area of occupation did not recede, but on the contrary slowly expanded.


In my own youth the decaying power of Islam (for it was still decaying) in the Near East was a strong menace to the peace of Europe. Those old people of whom I speak had grandparents in whose times Islam was still able to menace the West. The Turks besieged Vienna and nearly took it, less than a century before the American Declaration of Independence. Islam was then our superior, especially in military art. There is no reason why its recent inferiority in mechanical construction, whether military or civilian, should continue indefinitely. Even a slight accession of material power would make the further control of Islam by an alien culture difficult. A little more and there will cease that which our time has taken for granted, the physical domination of Islam by the disintegrated Christendom we know.


Catholic children at “catholic schools” do not need to take these classes. They can be easily exempted by changing one’s property tax designation (even if you are Catholic)