The 2nd generation of Gaglianos basically run and largely fund Salt and Light. They also own St Joseph Communications which runs Toronto Life etc.
this mag pushes lgbtq, abortion, transgender surgery etc.
Another mag is weddingbells:
Seems to fit right in with Rosica and Greg Baum etc
Does the Cardinal and Archdiocese approve of Frank Gagliano’s publications?
ONLY permitted reason for a board in-camera mtg is the following. “Controversial topic” is not an allowed reason!
A few excerpts from a PDF on a FOI that cover 3 days of internal OCSB emails:
Trustee Brian Coburn asks for a discussion at next in camera meeting. THIS IS NOW ALLOWED!
Vice Chair Wittet also talks about an agenda item for next meeting. Except that looking at all agendae and minutes since then (esp Jan 22), there IS NOTHING THERE. Certainly looks like this was brought and discussed IN CAMERA. NOT ALLOWED by the Education Act!
The Information Commissioner and Ombudsman and Police should investigate! How many other things are discussed illegally in-camera??
The following FOI was done by a friend of our group (downloadable). 69 pages over 3 days:
Other things to note:
- Only 14 parents complained. All were pro LGBT (eg. parents with gay partners, parents who are LGBTQ activists)
- Several trustees also complained (eg. Spencer Warren et al)
- One parent called all priests who visit classrooms pedophiles. No concern by school board (but they were unhappy with a tweet by the book author)
- NO reference or concern for Catholic teachings in the Catechism by ANYONE at the Board!
In the interests of transparency, do Cupich and Rosica agree with the above AUSCP statement or with the Church position that men with deep seated same sex attraction (even if celibate!!) should NOT be ordained? Notice the ORs? Even having the tendencies bars one from ordination!
“In the light of such teaching, this Dicastery, in accord with the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, believes it necessary to state clearly that the Church, while profoundly respecting the persons in question, cannot admit to the seminary or to holy orders those who practise homosexuality, present deep-seated homosexual tendencies or support the so-called “gay culture”.
Such persons, in fact, find themselves in a situation that gravely hinders them from relating correctly to men and women. One must in no way overlook the negative consequences that can derive from the ordination of persons with deep-seated homosexual tendencies.”
Do Cupich and Rosica agree with the following?? BE TRANSPARENT!
And will the Canadian Jesuits still honour plagiarist Rosica (and also the Basilian coverup of Fr Jack Hanna (credibly accused of sexually abusing a teen boy)?
This “spiritual club” is about talking “horebul stuff” and “mysterious things”
So really it is more a spiritism or occult club.
How could anyone say no? Easy!! Be Catholic and say NO!