#OECTA continues its LGBT push in nudist Pride Parade @archtoronto #Toronto #tcdsb

We know that Cardinal Collins does NOT approve of them marching in the Parade. In fact, OECTA got special mention of their disobedience in the Ad Limina report to the Pope and Rome.

Will they also be supporting “T” transanimals?



It is important to note that it is not just the LEADERSHIP of OECTA that is anti-Catholic. The rank and file are also anti-Catholic. 80% of them are like the leadership!!!




700 of them cheering at rainbow flags at the OECTA AGM:



What really happened at Trudeau Vatican visit? #cdnpoli #ottnews #toronto

Pope and Justin and Yogi wife at END of meeting:

justin pope



This is what the Vatican said happened:

“[T]he good bilateral relations between the Holy See and Canada were evoked, along with the contribution of the Catholic Church to the social life of the country. The parties then focused on the themes of integration and reconciliation, as well as religious freedom and current ethical issues.”

The statement also said, “in the light of the results of the recent G7 summit, attention turned to various matters of an international nature, with special attention to the Middle East and areas of conflict.”


What does religious freedom and current ethical issues mean?

Well, what did the Ontario Bishops briefs the Pope on 3 week ago?? EUTHANASIA and LIFE ISSUES and CONSCIENCE RIGHTS!!

Who believes that Justin did not get an earful from the Pope on these current ethical issues?? The meeting ended on this matter. Don’t listen to Justin’s sunny ways propaganda about the meeting!


What was in the Ad Limina Report?:

Ad Limina 2017 – ACBO Regional Report FINAL (Aug 25 2016)  PDF

While there are potential gains in terms of the economy and treatment of FNMI, there are also highly significant challenges with the government of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. As will be indicated in some detail later in this report, the new government is tasked with developing procedures to implement the Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicide. In 2015, the court had given the legislators six months to develop the procedures. However, no action was taken during the election campaign. The new government established a committee to seek advice. Their report went much further than the ruling of the Supreme Court and has caused significant concern for those who respect the dignity of life. This issue will be dealt with separately. Needless to say, however, the current government espouses more of a secular approach to life issues than the previous one did.


Legalization in Canada of Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide 48

In February 2015, the Supreme Court of Canada overturned the legal ban on euthanasia and assisted suicide and gave the federal government several months to pass legislation to amend the Criminal Code and make these acts legal in our country.

Following the Supreme Court decision, bishops across Canada made a concerted effort to educate Catholics about the teaching of our Church that the intentional act of killing oneself or another human being is very seriously morally wrong, because it is against the love of God and is an affront to human life and dignity. Consequently, we must not cooperate in such an act, either by euthanasia or assisted suicide.

In their teaching, the bishops emphasized that the proposed legislation would put at risk those who are vulnerable in our society, the elderly and infirm and persons with disabilities and mental illness. Furthermore, it would be unjust to coerce a healthcare worker who is opposed to euthanasia and assisted suicide to act against his or her conscience or, in the case of a healthcare facility, in order to qualify for public funding.

Along with ecumenical and interfaith leaders, the bishops held news conferences and met with elected representatives, urging them to defend and protect the lives of all, especially the vulnerable, and to safeguard conscience rights. Together, we advocated that palliative care should be available to every Canadian and that it was unacceptable that only a third of Canadians have access to it now. We affirmed that when people are dying, we should care for them, support them with our love and deal with their pain.

Many Canadians of different faiths, and of no faith at all, opposed the proposed legislation, realizing that it posed a grave moral threat with profound implications for our society. Thousands of Catholics responded to the appeals of their bishops and contacted their Members of Parliament to voice their concerns and joined coalitions against euthanasia and assisted suicide.

Despite these objections, on June 17, 2016, Parliament passed legislation that made euthanasia and assisted suicide legal in Canada.

The bishops will continue our opposition to the new law and to speak with a common voice in defence of the dignity of all human life. We realize that we will need to strengthen our efforts to educate the faithful and propose to them a Christian vision of life and suffering. As healthcare comes under the jurisdiction of the Province of Ontario, we will be advocating provincially for the protection of conscience rights for healthcare providers and for our Catholic hospitals to continue their mission without threats of defunding, as well as for a strategy to make palliative care accessible to everyone.


New #OCSB exemption policy violates law #ottnews #ocsbdl #onted

Further analysis shows that whole process of going to Principal, having to provide a “reason” and the possibility of denial by Principal , violates 42(13) of the Education Act. It also gives the principals local opportunity for intimidation.



The act 42(13) says this:

(13) In addition to the exemptions provided for in subsection (11), no person who is qualified to be a resident pupil in respect of a secondary school operated by a public board who attends a secondary school operated by a Roman Catholic board shall be required to take part in any program or course of study in religious education on written application to the Board of,

(a) the parent or guardian of the person;

So, all you have to do is write the Board (ie. Director of Education), copy Superintendent and Principal and tell them that you are asserting your right for exemption and that it is immediate and applies for all x years of high school. Send a copy of your public school MPAC assessment. There is NO requirement for a reason or for permission from Principal!! Those requirements violate the Education Act! Do not be bullied by the OCSB!



Read this: no reason or meeting!!!!!!



#Ottnews New #OCSB policy shows how parents can get kids’ exemption from heretical Religion Classes

The new policy is closer to following the law. The demand for a “reason” is awful. The Simcoe County Catholic Board has already been taken to the Human Rights Commission for having an overly arduous process.

Please note the 8 weeks notice. So, get your MPAC changed ASAP to the Public Board. Your children can still go to the school and their can be ZERO punishments.

A reason can be “conflict with home religious values”. There is NO invalid reason, but it’s better to make a good reason that the principal cannot argue with (another one is the Parent is Primary Educator and you believe that the religion classes are inappropriate for your children)


ReligiousEducationCompulsoryforElementaryandSecondaryStudents            PDF








 When demanding an exemption from CARFLEO/OECTA Religion classes, please remember to include the notice that no admin, teacher or guidance counsellor should talk in any way to your child about this matter. This is only a matter between parent and Principal. In fact, regardless of whether your child takes religion class or not, goes to Public or “catholic” school, a note should be sent to the Principal etc (and kept on file) that there should be NO meetings with any guidance counsellor and child without a parent present.

Guidance counsellors are often “attack vectors” that divide a parent and child. We have heard several stories about this and felt the need to warn parents.

#OCSB and its SECRET contracts #ottnews #onted #onpoli

Why is OCSB trying to keep its contracts with private academies operating within its schools secret?? One can only speculate why a government official is so adamant to keep things secret when the IPC Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario says contracts should be made public.

A nice request was made for contracts between OCSB and Canadian Topflight Academy. Our friend received these nasty paragraphs in various emails.




It is 100% clear that contracts do NOT contain confidential business information and are to be made public!!

see MO-3178 page 32
 Miller Transit Limited v Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario et al, 2013 ONSC 7139 (CanLII), Miller Transit and York Region argued that a union was not entitled to copies of parts of a contract for bus services between Miller Transit and York Region. The Ontario Privacy Commissioner disagreed and found that the information in the contract was not supplied by Miller Transit. The Ontario Privacy Commissioner took the position that the content of a contract with a government institution and a third party is presumed to have been generated in the give and take of negotiations, and not “supplied” by the third party. The Divisional Court upheld the decision of the Ontario Privacy Commissioner
 Alarm bells should go off when the issue of impacting a secret business relationship is more important than disclosing information to taxpayers who pay for the classrooms, gyms and sports fields that these private for-profit academies now have access to.
We don’t even know how many of the CTA students are Catholic or were previously students at OCSB. Unlike other academies that actually run their own schools, CTA gets to use OCSB facilities (at no cost) including exclusive use of a private classroom.  How do the students on the “regular” school basketball team feel?

People who have manifest determination for Euthanasia to be denied Sacramental Anointing #cdnpoli #ottnews

Why does Justin Trudeau (promote of euthanasia (refused to use notwithstanding clause), and huge promoter of abortion) think that he can waltz in and receive Eucharist on national TV in front of 25 Bishops and Cardinals??


Archbishop Prendergast is to be praised for not allowing the Sacrament of Anointing to be Abused.

This came out this week:






Manifest determination 73. Th e most challenging situation is one in which the person requesting anointing, or for whom anointing has been requested, has made clear and public his or her intention to seek out medical assistance in committing suicide or death by euthanasia. Again, careful discernment must be achieved through conversation with the person. If there is any indication that death by these procedures is being contemplated as an example to promote their practice, the priest must point out that such an intention takes on “the gravity of a scandal” (CCC, 2282). If obstinately maintained, the intention is a clear indication of lack of disposition. Th e sacrament is to be deferred


++ Prendergast has also been firm on divorced and remarried people (without a nullity) NOT receiving communion. Thank you for defending LIFE ++Prendergast!! :


@JustinTrudeau breaks Church ban on communion #cdnpoli #ottnews #catholic

At 122eucharist



PM Trudeau, in his Rainbow socks, received communion (eucharist) today at the 375 anniversary mass. This was broadcast live on CTV  and cbc Montreal . At 1:20:52 sharp




This is PROLIFE Week in the Catholic Church in Canada. And Justin has the gall to receive communion after he has been not to??

Why did the Bishops allow this? Why did they give him a place of honour to speak at a Mass? After all he done to promote abortion and euthanasia? and take away conscience rights of doctors.

Journalists need to ask Justin why he disrespects the rules. Or will they give him a pass, unlike what they did for Harper?



Ottawa’s Auxiliary Bishop Christian Riesbeck has warned that there is a possibility that Canon Law 915 could be enforced against Justin Trudeau to deny him Holy Communion if he does not back off his decision to ban pro-life candidates from running for nominations to represent the Liberal Party of Canada in the next federal election.

Canon Law states that those who are “obstinately persevering in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted to Holy Communion.

Bishop Riesbeck: “Out of concern for safeguarding the reverence that is due Our Lord in the Eucharist and to avoid scandal, one could possibly apply this norm even in the case of a pro-abortion Catholic politician who is extremely vocal about his position”


Related links:





Archbishop Prendergast (Justin’s Bishop!) in 2008:


I interviewed Archbishop Prendergast on the issue recently and he revealed what seems to be a hidden truth in the abortion and communion debate.  He explained that denial of Holy Communion to pro-abortion politicians is an act of love for the Catholic politician him or herself – an act meant to call the politician back to the truth.  Prendergast said: “The Church’s concern is for anyone who persists in grave sin, hoping that medicinal measures may draw them away from the wrong path to the truth of our faith.” He said that “medicinal” remedies such as “denial of communion” are employed to “draw them back to the way of Christ, Our Lord, the Way, the Truth and the Life.”


Archbishop will refuse communion to pro-choice politicians. IN OTTAWA. National Post – (Latest Edition) – 2008-03-08 – Canada – BY JENNIFER GREEN




See all the Bishops and Cardinals there?