The “catholic” principals organizations is in cahoots with the Ontario Immoral Sex Ed Ministry of Education/indoctrination to come up with an Equity and Inclusive Education (EIE) project for LGBT students
All the key phrases are used “EIE”, “deliverables to the Ministry”, etc
What is NOT mentioned? CATHOLIC teaching!
What are the chances that they will show LOVE to students with same sex attraction by telling them the TRUTH?
The resources are all HERE! PASTORAL GUIDELINES TO ASSIST STUDENTS OF SAME-SEX ORIENTATION
“Parents and local Catholic communities of faith depend on Catholic school boards, trustees, principals, teachers, counsellors and chaplains to transmit faithfully the Church’s moral teachings to their Catholic students, always with charity, gentleness, tact and understanding. In the case of inappropriate moral conduct the duty of Catholic schools is to guide students into morally acceptable paths. “
“The Church makes a critical distinction between orientation, and conduct or behaviour. The Church clearly teaches that homosexual acts are immoral.11 Included under homosexual acts are genital sexual activity and erotic relational behaviour with a person of the same sex. Thus, romantic behaviour between homosexual persons is morally unacceptable, because it points toward future sexual relationships that are non-marital. Romantic behaviour is not confined to a set of defined activities. It is a description of one-to-one relational behaviour which involves sexual attraction”
“Adolescent students are not always the best judges of their own sexual orientation. When a student discloses a same-sex attraction, it does not necessarily mean that the student is homosexual. “
“While the Church respects an individual who has done his or her best to come to a correct moral judgment, it is not obligated to accommodate a decision based on an individual’s erroneous conscience. This includes a student who blamelessly arrives at the mistaken conclusion that homosexual acts can be morally good. There is an objective truth concerning moral issues; and error, even when blameless, does not change the nature of this truth.”
All the above excerpts are in contrast to:
Also, will the CPCO Resources teach children with gender identity issues (aka transgender) what the Church’s teachings are? Will they show them the work of Dr Paul McHugh, former Chair of Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins?
“In the Vatican’s full response – which the bishop provided in his statement – the congregation explained that transsexual behavior “reveals in a public way an attitude opposite to the moral imperative of solving the problem of sexual identity according to the truth of one’s own sexuality.”
“Therefore it is evident that this person does not possess the requirement of leading a life according to the faith and in the position of godfather and is therefore unable to be admitted to the position of godfather or godmother,” they said, referring to canon 874 §3 in the Code of Canon Law.”
We have warned before that EIE is a bigger threat to Catholic children than the sex ed curriculum alone. The above CPCO/Wynne plan is yet more evidence!
PS: A couple bonus links that we may discuss in a further post:
Already in 1988, an Ontario Bishop was warning against FULLY ALIVE (and it is much worse now)
Bishop Roman Danylak of Canada reflected the same teaching as the Roman Pontiffs and TMHS in denouncing a Canadian chastity program called Fully Alive:
It ignores the latency period of our children and therefore can contribute to the loss of innocence. It gives group instruction in intimate sexual matters although the Church has specifically forbidden this. It is woefully deficient in its treatment of moral principles. It often ignores the Church’s teaching on sin and grace and modesty. It does not distinguish between the different degrees of maturity in the same class, as the Church tells us teachers must do. It violates the principle of imparting information on sexual matters only at the point of development when this is needed. The ‘Fully Alive’ program is not a program for formation in Christian virtue but a program of imparting sexual knowledge to children . . . This sex education program descends to the level of child abuse.