Hot 899 Transgender and the #OCSB


Given that “Gender Identity” will be taught to Grade 3s (age 8), one needs to read up on these theories.

The blog has recently been reading an absoutely fascinating article:

We know that the local pop station Hot 899 is very popular in #OCSB (dances, a classroom calling themselves “Hot 899 “hotties”” etc)

The radio station has done gay marriages on the radio, paid for IVF, and now they are paying $40,000 for an attempted sex change (one cannot change your sex) for a winning contestant.

“Surgery can only create the appearance of the other sex. Dr George Burou, a Casablancan physician who has operated on over seven hundred American men, explained, “I don’t change men into women. I transform male genitals into genitals that have a female aspect. All the rest is in the patient’s mind.”

Hot899 present it as the “new normal”. It most certainly is NOT!

Will the OCSB continue to have Hot899 into schools? Will children then listen to Hot 899 and find yet more non-Catholic beliefs?? Parents: Wake up!

Remember what Archbishop Prendergast has said:

“Guests and partners must give an authentic Catholic witness that will inspire and encourage, not a counter-witness that will discourage and confuse,” he added. “No matter how great their achievements in politics, business, sports, science, or the arts, we should not invite to our schools as guest speakers, or give awards to, those who provide a counter-witness to the Gospel.”




Disclaimer: Needless to say, this blog advocates NO hatred towards those that have GID (gender identity dysphoria). They should be treated with love and respect and truth.


#OCSB and Gay “Graphic Novels”

Why are children in Grade 6 reading cartoon books (so-called GNs – graphic novels). the book is at a Grade 2-3 reading level!

This book is about twins who both claim to be gay. And another with questionable sexuality (bi?). One of the boys dresses as a girl and kisses another boy.

This was apparently taught last year at St Isidore. Don’t think that “sex ed” is only taught as part of Religion class or Phys Ed. The whole EIE (equity and inclusive education) means that anti-Catholic things are taught across the entire curriculum.

St Isidore Grade 5 and 6 Drame Raina

“Our first title to discuss from the YALSA Hub Reading Challenge is Raina Telgemeier’s Drama. Drama has been singled out as one of the Great Graphic Novels for Teens Top Ten for 2013, and was also selected as aStonewall Book Award Honor book.

As a refresher, the Great Graphic Novels for Teens Selection list showcases titles “recommended for those ages 12-18, meet the criteria of both good quality literature and appealing reading for teens,” and every year they also select the top ten titles from their longer list.  The Stonewall Book Award selects titles “honored for exceptional merit relating to the gay/lesbian/bisexual/transgender experience.”


1 Star reviews:



Tip of the iceberg, parents, tip of the iceberg. This blog could publish many more stories like this.

Equity across ALL curriculum



#OCSB and the “Inquisition”

Even the anti-Catholic BBC acknowledges that the stories about the Inquisition are 99% myth:

Yet, a very quick search finds books like “Fanatics” by William Bell. It is in the Library of OCSB school Frank Ryan (intermediate). Probably in other schools too. (even the school librarian loved the book!)

Here is a review showing how the book pushes the myth of the Inquistion (and thereby helping to destroy the Catholic faith of innocent 12 year old readers!)

Bell’s parallel plots are fast moving, his characterization is sound, and the love between his two main characters is affecting. His articulation of the theme, however, is rather heavy handed. We’re fairly regularly bopped over the head with the notion that democracy suffers and intolerance thrives when small, exclusive groups of men press for adherence to a single religious truth and for the establishment of a theocracy. This was the case during the (Catholic Church’s) Inquisition and it’s the case now when Islamist adherents use terror and torture to make others toe their lines. Generally, the book is well done. Certainly, it’s highly respectful of young readers’ intelligence, based as it is on historical figures from the time of the Inquisition. An added note: Bell’s book works well without the (sometimes troublesome) language and graphic sexual scenes that are often seen in young adult texts. However, some of his ideas may still ruffle the feathers of fundamentalist readers…so the book is subversive in its own neat way–challenging younger readers with its more liberal ideas about religion, sexuality, feminism, and marriage/family life.


Parents: there are many books that should NOT be “catholic” schools. It reminds me of this:

Transgender and the #Catholic Church #ocsb

Given this story, it is important to read the links below:



“In the Vatican’s full response – which the bishop provided in his statement – the congregation explained that transsexual behavior “reveals in a public way an attitude opposite to the moral imperative of solving the problem of sexual identity according to the truth of one’s own sexuality.”

“Therefore it is evident that this person does not possess the requirement of leading a life according to the faith and in the position of godfather and is therefore unable to be admitted to the position of godfather or godmother,” they said, referring to canon 874 §3 in the Code of Canon Law.

3) A Bishop in Ohio insists Catholic teachers sign a morality clause including this:


g) No Engaging in or supporting transvestitism, transgenderism, or sex reassignment.


Our blog calls for no unjust discrimination of any student or teacher! LOVE (and TRUTH!)



Was the #OCSB “In Camera” Board meeting on SexEd legal?

A friend of the CIA did an FOI and forwarded it to us. Several of us in the CIA blog are on very tight budgets (eg. university tuition for kids), so we appreciate the work of our ally!

  1. The Board appears to moving full speed ahead with the ICE material for sex ed this year
  2. They continue to monitor “Conservative Catholics” (btw, there is no such thing, only orthodox Catholic and dissenting Catholic) and groups like “coalition of concerned parents” (a muslim dominated group in Toronto). Remember, taxpayers are paying the salary of this OCSB monitor.
  3. Most concerning is that there was a Closed “In Camera” Board meeting on Sept 8 on the topic of sex ed. One item for the meeting was the ICE material for inclusion on the OCSB website.

Whether or not, you support radical new sex ed, you should be concerned about the closed door meeting of the Board!

These are the ONLY reasons under the Education Act to have a closed door meeting:

Allowable reasons:

• the security of the property of the board

• the disclosure of intimate, personal, or financial information about a member of the board or one of its committees, an employee or prospective employee of the board, or a pupil or his or her parent or guardian

• the acquisition or disposal of a school site

• negotiations with employees of the board

• litigation affecting the board. [s. 207(2)]

A school board must make all its decisions in public at a regular or special meeting of the board.

So, how does sex ed discussion even remotely fit under one of the above reasons?

Perhaps, sex ed has something to do the sale of a school?

As taxpayers and parents, we demand to know:

  • What was exactly discussed at the private sex ed meeting?
  • What decisions were made? We have not seen these decisions brought to the Open Board meeting for vote
  • How many other closed door Board meetings have occurred that were NOT for the allowable 5 reasons?
  • What will the provincial Ombudsman say?

The OCSB annual report always says this: “The production of this report supports our commitment to openness, transparency and accountability in the education system.”.

How are closed Board meetings on sex ed showing this commitment?

Please contact the media and your local trustee and demand the details of this meeting and their sex ed plans! What other boards are having closed Board meetings to get radical new sex ed into Ontario schools?

Please share!



UPDATE: Wed morning: In the interests of fairness: We report this new communication from OCSB:

“Further to your email below, the “sex ed for closed board meeting, Sept 8” referred to in the staff email of Aug 31st, was misunderstood by a staff member and was not intended for the Committee of the Whole.
There will be a report coming to the Regular Board on the Physical and Health Education Curriculum and the Family Life Curriculum in the near future. The Board Agenda is posted to the OCSB website on the Monday before each Board Meeting.”


Why is #OCSB /ACBO/ICE ignoring Vatican II and obeying Wynne?

We have written before about how the ICE “Fully Alive” sex ed program is bad for children. One Ontario bishop called it “child abuse”.

Fully Alive is about to get even worse with gender-bending, pro-gay-marriage and contraception push by the Ontario government (Wynne/Levin). Not even possible to have a “Catholic lens” on it.

Here is an interesting article on it:

Why is Roger Lawler and the ACBO Bishops (and ICE) disobeying the following Vatican document:? Please note the Wynne/Levin are perversely designed for Grade 3 onwards (not Grade 5.. that is “old hat”)

In 1995, the Pontifical Council for the Family issued The Truth and Meaning of Human Sexuality: Guidelines for Education within the Family (TMHS), a document meant to guide Catholic families in the proper way to form their children in this area. The late Kenneth Whitehead, a Catholic author and former assistant secretary of education in the Reagan administration, summarized the document:

Given the delicacy and sensitivity of this particular kind of subject matter, the Church has constantly and consistently held that this kind of education in chastity is best done privately, in the heart of the family, as Vatican II taught. This should take into strict account the individual stage of development of each child thus being educated — TMHS has a long, scientifically accurate, and very useful section on Children’s Principal Stages of Development, which, among other things, reaffirms the importance of the child’s latency period (although it does not use this particular term). The latency period, of course, is the time in the young person’s development when the explicit information about the facts of life should precisely not be given — although most modern school programs are specifically and perversely designed to give it at this very time (usually the fifth grade) in order to break down the child’s natural defenses.


Parents: Wake up and save your childrens’ souls (and your own too!)). Opt out is NOT an option. The EIE curriculum is spread across the year and the day.

Equity across ALL curriculum

no opt out

PEACE Ontario is now collecting stories of various things being taught THIS week.

Here is one from a school board:


French Class: Talking about ‘amour”. Grade 7 boy had an ‘improv warm up’ where they picked same sex partners and were to pretend having a ‘lovers quarrel’.


How will this new curriculum impact what is taught in Catholic schools?

2015: Liz Sandals: The curriculum is the same in public schools and Catholic schools—this is the Ontario curriculum. In the case of the Catholic schools, they also do a lot of curriculum development through an organization called ICE, which is the Institute for Catholic Education, and that’s the Catholic teachers, the Catholic principals, the Catholic directors—it’s all the stakeholders in the Catholic education system. The Bishops are represented there too. So we work with ICE on the development of their curriculum. They will make some components of the curriculum part of their family life course.

In terms of (what) your parents would want to know, the Catholic trustees, the Catholic teachers, the Catholic principals, the Catholic directors have all been quite supportive of the curriculum.


Liz Sandals has also said this:

 2015: ” that while the Catholic school system will be able to provide “commentary” on the government-mandated sex-ed through its own family life program, it won’t be allowed to change anything and must “deliver” the sex-ed as written.”

Imagine if the #OCSB had an MOU for parents?

There are no state-run (ie. Wynne-driven) Catholic schools in the USA. There are over 2million children in parochial schools (private from the government) in the US.

This is an example of the MOU for parents from Philadelphia CATHOLIC schools.


Catholics in the USA take these papal quotes SERIOUSLY:

Why not Canadians?


PS: What percentage of Gay Pride marching OECTA teachers would be willing to sign a morality clause like this one from Ohio??

The Teacher-Minister understands that actions and speech that are contrary to Catholic teaching shall be grounds for disciplinary action up to and including termination. The following, although in no way an exclusive list, represents by way of example certain speech or actions that are considered to be contrary to the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church:

a) Public support of positions contrary to Roman Catholic Church teaching (including, but not limited to, publically supporting abortion, euthanasia, assisted suicide, embryonic stem cell research, in vitro fertilization, artificial insemination, surrogate parenthood, direct sterilization, or so-called homosexual or same-sex marriage or unions).

b) Procuring or assisting another in procuring an abortion.

c) Making use of or participating in artificial insemination, in-vitro fertilization, or surrogate parenthood.

d) Preparing for or engaging in a same-sex marriage or union.

3) Engaging in or publicly supporting sexual relations outside of marriage (which shall be understood for purposes of this Agreement as being the marriage between one man and one woman).

f) Living with another as husband or wife without the benefit of a marriage recognized  as valid by the Roman Catholic Church or co-habitating outside of marriage.

g) Engaging in or supporting transvestitism, transgenderism, or sex reassignment.

h) Membership in any organization that is anti-Catholic or whose philosophy is in any way contrary to the ethical or moral teachings of the Roman Catholic Church.

i) Indecent or lewd behavior (including, but not limited to, the unlawful use of drugs, substance abuse, or use of pornography).

j) Serious dishonesty.

k) Entering into a marriage with a person when one of the parties to the marriage is validly married to another person in the eyes of the Roman Catholic Church (e.g., entering into a marriage if one of the parties has entered into marriage previously and has not received an annulment  from the Roman Catholic Church).

l) Use of social media or electronic means of communication (e.g., email and texting) in an improper, immoral, or scandalous manner (including, but not limited to, use of social media or electronic means to communicate, post, share, or send material that is lewd, indecent, sexually suggestive, or pornographic).

m) Any other actions or speech that are considered by the Roman Catholic Church to be immoral or evil or which might cause scandal, as such term is understood by the Roman Catholic Church (i.e., an attitude or behavior which leads or tempts another to do that which the Roman Catholic Church considers evil or immoral).