OECTA unsurprisingly comes out to support new Gay Sex ed etc #ocsb

No surprise that the World-Pride-marching OECTA loves the new curriculum on gay marriage, gender fluidity etc

cohn

It is also no surprise that the Toronto Red Star (remember they are run by the “Atkinson Principles”) was leaked the new sex ed curriculum last week. Writer Cohn whitewashes the curriculum and then insults parents. He also doesn’t mention parts like gay marriage and gender bending (both labelled demonic by Pope Francis)

http://www.thestar.com/news/queenspark/2015/02/21/revealed-the-sex-ed-update-ontario-badly-needs-cohn.htmlcohn2

As I reported yesterday, ICE (Institute for Catholic Education) has been co-opted by the sneaky Liberals. Despite the tough warnings on the sex ed programme by Archbishop Prendergast, ICE (run by a committee of ACBO Bishops led by relatively liberal Bishop Bergie from St Catharines) is preparing to introduce the sex ed curriculum this fall!!

ICE is run by the former Director of Halton Catholic School Board, Michael Pautler. He gave a talk last year with the rather bizarre description about “discerning a same-sex orientation”. I have heard about discerning the priesthood, but discerning to enter into the gay lifestyle?

http://www.catholiccurriculumcorp.org/2014Program.pdf

Pautler

The CBC has also reported on the new sex ed:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/new-ontario-sex-ed-curriculum-to-include-look-at-sexting-risks-1.2966644

“The guide advises parents that blocking Internet content is “typically ineffective” for older children and youth, and says the focus should be on helping kids develop skills for thinking critically about what they see online.”

“The reintroduced curriculum is not expected to show a marked departure from what was proposed in 2010. It will teach kids about homosexuality and same-sex marriages in Grade 3, encourage discussions about puberty, including masturbation, in Grade 6, and talk about preventing sexually transmitted diseases in Grade 7, which could include information on oral and anal sex.”

===

So, let’s just give 12 year old boys I-Phones with no parental controls and let them “think critically” when they view porn!! Grrrr

Expect a big push from the mainstream media, ICE, OECTA, OCSB etc insulting faithful Catholic parents for being “prudes”. Have courage and ignore it and their whitewashed info! Do not be frogs in slowly warming water

Boiling_Frogs_Pic_-_resized

Instead read quotes like below about what one should be doing for their children

Education quotes <– pdf of Education quotes

Divini Illius Magistri, 35 Reinforces the grave obligation of parents as the primary educators of their
 
children to refuse schools that threaten salvation of souls. “…as Leo XIII declares in another
 
memorable encyclical, where He thus sums up the rights and duties of parents: ‘By nature parents
 
have a right to the training of their children, but with this added duty that the education and
 
instruction of the child be in accord with the end for which by God’s blessing it was begotten.
 
Therefore it is the duty of parents to make every effort to prevent any invasion of their rights in this
 
matter, and to make absolutely sure that the education of their children remain under their own
 
control in keeping with their Christian duty, and above all to refuse to send them to those schools in
 
which there is danger of imbibing the deadly poison of impiety.’” (Emphasis added.)

OAPCE and Sex Ed #ocsb #onted #ottnews

OAPCE is a  group in bed with the pro-World Gay pride OECTA and the Lieberals! They are a front group.

See the following NP article.

What is very worrisome is that ICE looks ready to sell out faithful Catholic parents and let the radical sex ed curriculum into state-run catholic schools this September (private Catholic schools are NOT affected)

http://news.nationalpost.com/2015/02/20/ontarios-new-sex-ed-will-cover-homosexuality-masturbation-and-consent-not-everyones-saying-yes/

“It’s an anxiety Brian Evoy, president of the Ontario Association of Parents in Catholic Education, has recently heard.

“I’ve spoken to parents who’ve called me, and had this fear that their kids were going to be taught things they didn’t want to be taught,” he says. Grandparents have also expressed concerns that children are being taught about “free sex.”

His organization was part of the consultations on the updated sex-ed curriculum, he says, and the process was a positive one. He’s confident the Institute for Catholic Education (ICE) will find ways to interpret the curriculum so it makes sense for Catholic students.

“I don’t have a crystal ball and can’t tell you it’s going to be embraced by everyone,” he says. “But our organization is very much in favour of the curriculum and all of the changes that will be made.””

 Do NOT trust OAPCE or OECTA or ICE! Any words that ICE has to “nuance” anal sex or gender fluidity will not be satisfactory. Save the souls of your children!

Instead, listen to the words of Archbishop Prendergast:

https://catholicintelligenceblog.wordpress.com/2015/02/02/will-ocsb-obey-archbishop-or-pharaoh-wynne-on-sex-ed/

https://catholicintelligenceblog.wordpress.com/2015/01/31/ocsb-sex-ed-heading-toward-more-disease-and-abortions/

===============================

http://jonahintheheartofnineveh.blogspot.ca/2014/06/oapce-for-75-years-parental-voice-in.html

OAPCE3 OAPCE2 OAPCE1

****************************

PS: please take the time to watch this brian lilley video:

http://www.blazingcatfur.ca/2015/02/19/ontario-sex-ed-theyre-teaching-my-kids-to-do-what/

sexed

Is it ok for #OCSB chaplains to claim “Clergy Tax Deduction”? #ottnews

A science teacher has complained that school “chaplaincy leaders” are sometimes claiming the substantial “clergy tax deduction”. (Remember, priests that claim this make less than $25,000/yr)

Should Board Superintendents be signing the necessary forms? An interesting questions that a tax accountant or lawyer or the CRA should answer.

Bishops are the only legitimate authority to appoint or ordain
ministers. I am NOT aware of Bishops appointing or ordaining
Chaplains” in Catholic schools.

They specifically state that they do NOT give mandates to school “Chaplains”!

mandates

pastoral_letter_on_chaplaincy <– PDF from Bishops

The Catholic chaplains themselves (CSC0) say the crux of the matter is whether they are “mandated”:

http://www.csco.ca/documents/content_467.pdf

“David brought up the issue of the Clergy Residency Tax Deduction. The
deduction is significant for many chaplains. The CRA has clarified
that it applies to women and lay people and is not challenging it in
any way. Anne-Marie Tedesco asked if it applies to teacher –
chaplains. David said he wasn’t sure. Paul Maine-Devine offered to
give a workshop on this after this meeting. David went over the
history of a challenge to it from one of the boards. The executive has
contacted a tax lawyer and canon lawyer. The issue remains unresolved
in some boards. The crux of the matter is whether or not we are
‘mandated’ by the bishop to do the work we do. David asked that
members let the executive know if their supervisors start refusing to
sign the forms.”

—————
The question is whether a commissioning ceremony or having a Bishop’s representative at job interviews is anywhere close to a “mandate”.

See below
http://csco.ca/documents/content_96.doc
“appointed or recognized by a body or person with the legitimate
authority to appoint  or ordain ministers on behalf of or within the
religious denomination”. The appointment of school chaplains is done
by the Catholic school boards by virtue of the recognized place of
these boards within the Catholic community. In addition, the local
Bishops give their recognition of the school chaplains in a variety of
ways.  Some bishops conduct commissioning ceremonies for their school
chaplains; others may give specific approval (through the school
board) of each chaplaincy appointment); and all of them, in a general
or specific way, apply a nihil obstat to the appointment of the
chaplains by the school boards.  ”

—–

Nice Latin words “Nihil Obstat”, but they apply to book publishing not appointments – there is no “Nihil Obstat” in Canon Law for jobs. Sounds nice and sophisticated though!

——

CRA rules:
http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/E/pub/tp/it141r-consolid/it141r-consolid-e.txt

“Paragraph 5. A “regular minister” is a person who is

– authorized or empowered to perform spiritual duties, conduct religious
services, administer sacraments and carry out similar religious functions.
Religious functions may include participation in the conduct of religious
services, the administration of some of the rituals, ordinances or sacraments,
and pastoral responsibilities to specific segments of the religious
organization;
is appointed or recognized by a body or person with the legitimate authority
to appoint or ordain ministers on behalf of or within the religious
denomination; and
– is in a position or appointment of some permanence.

Paragraph 6. In the absence of a legitimate appointment or recognition, the
mere performance of the duties of a minister will not suffice to constitute a
“regular minister”. ”

http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=29a2c66f-d27b-4b4b-894f-5bebe8143b42

Perhaps, the bigger issue is why some school chaplaincy leaders think of themselves as clergy that are in any way equivalent to our holy priests! And why do School Boards?
clergy

Edit: The following CSCO document TOTALLY doesn’t address the point about  “is appointed or recognized by a body or person with the legitimate authority to appoint or ordain ministers on behalf of or within the religious
denomination”. School boards do not have legitimate authority to appoint ministers!

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/157511750/Memo-Clergy-Tax-Deduction—Catholic-School-Chaplains-of-Ontario

clergy2

What are the leaders of #OCSB GSAs like?

Are they anything like Danny Dilallo?

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/toronto-catholic-teacher-who-oversees-gay-club-claims-catechism-doesnt-teac

Accepting School Act Conference Schedule — PDF of Jer’s Vision Conference where Danny is presenting

Danny

The similarities between Danny’s GSA (“No Names”) and GSAs like OCSB St Peter’s “Love is Louder” are remarkable. So it is reasonable to ask whether the leaders of GSAs in Ottawa hold similar views to Danny Dilallo.

SPK Hogwarts Nonames hogwarts

No Names GSA York Catholic

SPK Love is Louder happy to radical gay

LoveisLouderJoeRogers

Love is Louder 1

BTW, there is a new GSA at Notre Dame NDHS – so the girls who started the GSA at nearby St George’s Elementary catholic school can move right to this one in Grade 7.

NDHS GSA

Extreme Secrecy at #OCSB

A friend of the CIA (and a devoted follower of St Joshua) did an FOI and shared the results with us.

Some observations:

1) For an “open and transparent” organization, the OCSB loved to black things out!! Why would an entire agenda be blacked out? Are the OCSB dealing with Russian or Chinese spy infiltration? I have seen less redaction on CSIS documents! Does the OCSB not realize that taxpayers have the RIGHT to information.

2) They are starting to do more and more phone conversations that cannot be FOIed. This might be something my friend might take up with the Provincial FOI authorities.

3) The gay newspaper, Daily Xtra seems mighty upset that the material those 2 GSA girls at St George’s “Gay rights” social justice fair might actually present may be made public by an insider at St George’s. They do NOT want parents to find out what is being shown to our children!

4) The OCSB seems to relieved that my 2 children have in fact graduated from St Matthew’s – does this lessen the FACTS on my blog in any way whatsoever??

FOI1 FOI2 FOI3 FOI4

Have #ocsb students been asked to declare jihad?

CARFLEO continues to whitewash Islam. I have previously written about their material in Grade 11 “World Religions”

Here is some material that says that there is only ONE definition of Jihad (struggle to make oneself a better Muslim, good works) and that Catholic students should make jihad

Jihad

Jihad

jihad2

CARFLEO which has trouble recognizing that there IS one central authority in Catholicism, has no trouble pushing the false belief that there IS a central authority in Islam and that they can authoritatively define Jihad.

In fact, large portions of Muslims DO believe that Jihad includes violence. Some surveys show 20% or more (with significant numbers of North American muslims,

http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=26661

OCSB students will be unable to fully understand the threat that violent Islam poses to Canada as they declare their own Jihad as an “exit ticket” from their course on Islam

PS: the last 45 seconds of the video on Jihad is on another subject – positive story of the pro-gay agenda of having gay activists as leaders in Boy Scouts.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZP1nAoajh0