Pope Francis in Amoris Laetietia
Frequently, sex education deals primarily with “protection” through the practice of “safe sex”. Such expressions convey a negative attitude towards the natural procreative finality of sexuality, as if an eventual child were an enemy to be protected against. This way of thinking promotes narcissism and aggressivity in place of acceptance. It is always irresponsible to invite adolescents to toy with their bodies and their desires, as if they possessed the maturity, values, mutual commitment and goals proper to marriage. They end up being blithely encouraged to use other persons as an means of fulfilling their needs or limitations. The important thing is to teach them sensitivity to different expressions of love, mutual concern and care, loving respect and deeply meaningful communication. All of these prepare them for an integral and generous gift of self that will be expressed, following a public commitment, in the gift of their bodies. Sexual union in marriage will thus appear as a sign of an all-inclusive commitment, enriched by everything that has preceded it.
This is what is taught in Grade 7 and 8 in Ontario “catholic” school in the new Wynne/Ben Levin sex ed:
Meanwhile, the Institute of Catholic Education (ICE) refuses to publicly release their supplementary material they committed to publish in November.
Will the #OCSB and other boards obey Pope Francis or bow to Caesar (Wynne)? Do they say “We have no King but Caesar!”?